- Sports Court: NIL Newsletter
- Posts
- NIL & Politics: Do they mix?
NIL & Politics: Do they mix?
The fastest 3 minutes in name, image and likeness
Thank you for your continued support of this newsletter. Please share with anyone who would be interested in this content.
If you are interested in NIL athlete representation, NIL education for your college or high school, and student-athlete personal brand coaching, please contact me: [email protected]
NIL and Politics
And should student-athletes talk about this publicly?
Athlete wearing ‘VOTE’ shirt. (Photo Credit: rockthevote.org)
Presidential elections are coming up soon in the United States.
Some college student-athletes will vote Democrat.
Others Republican.
Another group will vote Independent.
And some will not vote at all.
However, the real question is: Should student-athletes be discussing politics on social media related to NIL?
The Verdict
Not common - but not ordinary
While student-athletes generally don’t comment on politics, University of Montana athletes were proposed an NIL deal: Receive financial compensation in exchange of public support for Democratic state Senator Jon Tester. (Two athletes agreed to the deal.)
While we don’t know if this NIL deal is monetarily influenced or truly supporting a candidate, student-athletes should do their research first, as well as discuss with their school’s athletic department.
Also, student-athletes should expect some backlash from their followers and brands should they choose to support a candidate.
Push for voting instead
A nice in-between is pushing followers to vote in general, as opposed to supporting a specific candidate.
San Jose State football player Nick Nash recently did an NIL deal for exactly that.
If it’s not your lane, stay out of it
As some people say: If it’s not your interest, don’t talk about it publicly.
This can be for most topics; however, politics (along with religion) tend to be a more slippery slope than other interests. Again, do your research before entering into any NIL deals focused on politics.
Reply